[ad_1]
“Einstein did not do well in school.” I hear individual student tell me this old and somewhat exaggerated story. What seems to hope that I agree that it is not doing well is a fine thing. It’s not what I’m thinking.
Usually, “you are not Einstein”, it is believed that flashes in my mind. He did well in his career despite not experts in school. He failed because he did not excel.
Students fooling themselves with damp at the start wrong.
inductive reasoning involves moving specific facts in a pattern that forms a general conclusion.
But, right inductive reasoning involves considering numerous examples and considering a counter-offer examples to form general conclusions.
For example, if you were a college lacrosse coach who ran a summer camp and took many excellent Lacrosse players from Daniel Hand High School in Madison, Connecticut and you had few or no counter-offer examples of poor Lacrosse player from the same place, then make Madison, CT produces good lacrosse player would be a reasonable conclusion.
Or, if you were the admissions officer at the liberal arts college with the ability to deal with individual schools and you noticed repeatedly that East Lyme High in East Lyme, Connecticut produced students with excellent SAT II Math scores and you had few or no counter-offer examples, then you could do through inductive reasoning East Lyme High will have a strong math department
As another example of faulty inductive reasoning, we will hear :.
“Bill Gates dropped out of college.”
student making team is usually justified reason for going to college by trying to connect Gates early departure proof that dropping out of school leads to wealth .
As a parent, your answer should be that you can drop out of college if you have the same brightness and diligence that got Gates to Harvard in the first place and that you, like Gates, will dig in around the clock for many years to develop a revolutionary technological innovation.
If it is the case that counterparties examples are dominant – lots of people who have been able to educate their days doing well in their work – and / or dominant – people who graduate high school are more likely to earn more than those who do not graduate college – the inductive reasoning can not lead right to general conclusions
At best, such reasoning may be the beginning of a conversation about what it takes to succeed if one of the main. The reasons for the practical results – education – has been undermined
For example, there have been NBA basketball players who have succeeded despite being under 6 feet tall .. In each case, however, the player had other qualities: . Amazing quickness, agility, coordination, feel for the game and so on
In Einstein such a conversation should be that he has not done well in traditional educational settings. So, if you want to be like him, you begin to teach you more advanced physics!
When students send the message that it’s okay to underperform due to faulty metaphor, the life bad habits must be cultivated. If your student-child is not performing work to get good grades in Connecticut high school, he can create a routine that will hurt him in all future endeavors.
Parents let their children participate in the flawed reasoning are doing a disservice that will come back to haunt their children at some later point.
[ad_2]